Anti-meat agenda crumbles as study links animal protein to lower cancer risk, not higher mortality

• A new McMaster University study found no increased mortality risk from animal protein consumption and even a slight reduction in cancer deaths.
• Anti-meat narratives are driven by corporate interests pushing synthetic foods, not science.
• Processed meats and plant-based substitutes are the real health risks, not clean, organic animal protein.
• Globalist agendas aim to replace real food with patented alternatives under the guise of climate concerns.
• Quality, balance, and natural sources matter more than fear-based dietary restrictions.

For years, the anti-meat brigade—funded by Big Food, vegan activists, and globalist health agencies—has bombarded us with fearmongering claims that animal protein is a one-way ticket to an early grave. But a groundbreaking new study from McMaster University has just turned that narrative on its head.

After analyzing data from nearly 16,000 adults, researchers found no increased risk of death from animal protein consumption. In fact, the study, published in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, revealed something even more shocking: higher animal protein intake was associated with a modest but significant reduction in cancer-related mortality.

So much for the “meat will kill you” myth.

The research team, led by Stuart Phillips, a professor and chair of McMaster’s Department of Kinesiology, dug into data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), tracking dietary habits and mortality outcomes over decades. Unlike many observational studies that rely on flawed food-frequency questionnaires, this team used advanced statistical methods, including the National Cancer Institute (NCI) method and multivariate Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) modeling, to account for daily fluctuations in protein intake.

Their conclusion? “There’s a lot of confusion around protein—how much to eat, what kind and what it means for long-term health,” Phillips said. “This study adds clarity, which is important for anyone trying to make informed, evidence-based decisions about what they eat.”

And the clarity is damning for the anti-meat crusaders. The study found:

• No link between animal protein and higher mortality risk—from any cause, including heart disease or cancer.
• A slight protective effect against cancer deaths in those who consumed more animal protein.
• Plant protein showed no significant impact on cancer mortality, contrary to years of vegan propaganda.

Why this study matters in the age of corporate-controlled nutrition science

The war on meat isn’t about health; it’s about control, profit, and ideology. The same globalist elites pushing lab-grown “frankenmeat,” insect protein, and synthetic food alternatives have spent decades demonizing real, nutrient-dense animal foods. Why? Because real food can’t be patented, monopolized, or tied to carbon credit scams.

This study exposes the flimsy foundation of anti-meat claims. While past research, often funded by vegan advocacy groups or Big Pharma, has tried to link animal protein to higher mortality, those studies failed to account for critical factors, like:

• The difference between processed meats (loaded with nitrates and chemicals) and clean, organic, grass-fed animal proteins.
• Cooking methods (grilling vs. slow-cooking vs. frying) that can create carcinogenic compounds.
• The nutritional deficiencies in ultra-processed plant-based “meat” substitutes, which are often loaded with seed oils, synthetic additives, and GMO ingredients.

Why they want you to fear meat

The McMaster study isn’t just a win for meat-eaters; it’s a direct challenge to the globalist food control agenda. The World Economic Forum, Bill Gates, and their corporate allies have been open about their plans to restrict meat consumption under the guise of “climate change” and “sustainability.” Their solution? Fake meat, bug protein, and lab-grown slop—all of which require patents, corporate ownership, and government mandates.

But the truth is that human beings thrive on animal protein. It’s bioavailable, nutrient-dense, and essential for muscle maintenance, immune function, and brain health. The idea that we should replace it with ultra-processed plant-based junk just to line the pockets of Big Food executives isn’t just bad science. It’s a direct attack on human health and freedom.

Are you eating the right meat?

So, should you load up on bacon and steak every day? Not necessarily, but this study debunks the fearmongering that says animal protein is inherently dangerous. Here’s what you should consider:

• Quality matters. Grass-fed, organic, and pasture-raised meats are far superior to factory-farmed, hormone-pumped alternatives.
• Balance is key. A diet that includes both animal and plant proteins—along with healthy fats, fiber, and micronutrients—is optimal for longevity.
• Beware of processed junk. Whether it’s processed meats or fake vegan “chicken” nuggets, ultra-processed foods are the real killer.
• Question the narrative. The next time you hear that “meat causes cancer,” ask: Who funded that study? Was it an impartial scientific team, or a group with ties to Impossible Foods, the WEF, or Bill Gates’ fake meat investments?

This McMaster study is a major blow to the anti-meat propaganda machine. It proves what many of us have known all along: Animal protein is not the enemy. The real threats to our health are processed foods, corporate-controlled nutrition “science,” and the globalist agenda to restrict our food choices.

So go ahead and enjoy that steak. Savor that omelet. And never let fearmongers dictate what you put on your plate.

Sources for this article include:

ScienceDaily.com

MedicalXpress.com

DiscoverMagazine.com